From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sardella v. Hei Hotels #101 Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Summary

affirming New York Supreme Court's grant of summary judgment for defendant hotel operator where plaintiff hotel guest sustained injuries after diving into a closed pool in intoxicated state during after-hours

Summary of this case from Bensbeur v. Rihga Royal Hotel

Opinion

Argued October 5, 2000.

November 13, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated September 8, 1999, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Meyer, Meyer, Metli Keneally, LLP, Smithtown, N.Y. (James E. Robinson of counsel), for appellant.

Klein, DiSomma McGlynn, New York, N.Y. (Martin McGlynn of counsel), for respondents.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., WILLIAM C. THOMPSON, MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, LEO F. McGINITY, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

On June 12, 1994, at approximately 1:30 A.M., the plaintiff, an intoxicated guest at the defendants' hotel, climbed over a fence to gain access to the hotel's shallow no-diving pool, which was closed. He dove headfirst into the pool from a lifeguard stand and was seriously injured. The plaintiff, an adult, was an experienced swimmer and familiar with pools.

The Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, as they had no duty to protect the plaintiff from injuring himself in his intoxicated state (see, Allen v. County of Westchester, 109 A.D.2d 475). Moreover, assuming the existence of such a duty, the plaintiff's voluntary consumption of alcohol and reckless act of diving into the shallow no-diving pool, after hours, constituted an unforeseeable superseding event absolving the defendants of any liability (see, Olsen v. Town of Richfield, 81 N.Y.2d 1024; Howard v. Poseidon Pools, 72 N.Y.2d 972; Boltax v. Joy Day Camp, 67 N.Y.2d 617; Donohoe v. Town of Babylon, 246 A.D.2d 576; Edmonds v. Fodera, 239 A.D.2d 383; Sciangula v. Mancuso, 204 A.D.2d 708; Valdez v. City of New York, 148 A.D.2d 697).


Summaries of

Sardella v. Hei Hotels #101 Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 13, 2000
277 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

affirming New York Supreme Court's grant of summary judgment for defendant hotel operator where plaintiff hotel guest sustained injuries after diving into a closed pool in intoxicated state during after-hours

Summary of this case from Bensbeur v. Rihga Royal Hotel
Case details for

Sardella v. Hei Hotels #101 Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL SARDELLA, APPELLANT, v. HEI HOTELS #101 INC., ETC., ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 13, 2000

Citations

277 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
715 N.Y.S.2d 748

Citing Cases

Reilly v. Patchogue Props., Inc.

Moreover, a defendant owes no duty to protect a person from the consequences of his or her own voluntary…

Bensbeur v. Rihga Royal Hotel

" D'Amico, 518 N.E.2d at 900. A hotel has no duty to protect a guest from injuring himself in his intoxicated…