From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Saeed v. Obama

United States District Court, D. Columbia
May 12, 2009
Civil Action No. 05-2386 (RBW) (D.D.C. May. 12, 2009)

Summary

ordering further efforts to facilitate an in-person meeting between the petitioner and putative counsel to ensure that the petitioner's decision to forego legal representation was knowing and voluntary

Summary of this case from HAMOUD ABDULLAH HAMOUD HASSAN AL WADY v. OBAMA

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-2386 (RBW).

May 12, 2009


ORDER


The Court having considered the Respondents' Emergency Motion to Reconsider the Court's Order of May 1, 2009, and the Court finding, in accordance with the memorandum opinion recently issued by the Honorable Alan Kay of this Court in Al Wady v. Obama, Civil Action No. 08-CV-01237 (RMU) (AK), 2009 WL 1209067 (D.D.C. May 1, 2009), that the procedures employed by the Joint Task Force-Guantanamo (the "Joint Task Force") to facilitate interaction between counsel and individual petitioners, as articulated by the respondents in their emergency motion and in the declaration of Commander Don A. Martin (the "Martin Declaration" or "Martin Decl.") attached as Exhibit 1 thereto, do not adequately ensure that the rejection of counsel by an individual petitioner is knowing and voluntary, it is

ORDERED that the respondents' motion is DENIED. It is further

ORDERED that the Department of Defense shall take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that counsel for the petitioner is permitted to visit with the petitioner face-to-face during counsel's visit to the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base on May 19-20, 2009, including (1) approving his pending request to travel to Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, on May 18, 2009, and (2) arranging for a face-to-face meeting between counsel and the petitioner on May 19 or 20, 2009. It is further

ORDERED that the meeting between counsel and the petitioner to take place on May 19 or May 20, 2009, shall be held at a designated "meeting place," as that term is intended in paragraph 6 of the Martin Declaration. It is further

As stated in the Martin Declaration, "if the detainee elects to meet with counsel, the detainee is transported from his current location to the meeting place. Normally, counsel/detainee meetings take place at Camp Echo, a location specifically designed to facilitate such meetings in a secure and safe environment." Martin Decl. ¶ 6.

ORDERED that if the Joint Task Force concludes that the petitioner is likely to reject any request to meet face-to-face with counsel, it may transfer him to the designated meeting place described above without informing him of the purpose of his transfer, but that under no circumstances shall the Joint Task Force prevent counsel from meeting face-to-face with the petitioner. It is further

ORDERED that the Joint Task Force shall take whatever steps are necessary to ensure that the safety of the petitioner's counsel is not endangered during his meeting with the petitioner, including, if necessary, posting guards at the designated meeting place or placing the petitioner in restraints if the Task Force believes that he may become violent during his face-to-face meeting with counsel. It is further

ORDERED that the petitioner's motion to terminate the stay of his habeas corpus petition is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Saeed v. Obama

United States District Court, D. Columbia
May 12, 2009
Civil Action No. 05-2386 (RBW) (D.D.C. May. 12, 2009)

ordering further efforts to facilitate an in-person meeting between the petitioner and putative counsel to ensure that the petitioner's decision to forego legal representation was knowing and voluntary

Summary of this case from HAMOUD ABDULLAH HAMOUD HASSAN AL WADY v. OBAMA

ordering further efforts to facilitate an in-person meeting between the petitioner and putative counsel to ensure that the petitioner's decision to forego legal representation was knowing and voluntary

Summary of this case from Noori v. Obama
Case details for

Saeed v. Obama

Case Details

Full title:JAMIL AHMAD SAEED, Petitioner, v. BARACK H. OBAMA, President of the United…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: May 12, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-2386 (RBW) (D.D.C. May. 12, 2009)

Citing Cases

Noori v. Obama

Prior to dismissing a habeas petition for lack of authorization, however, this court must ensure that the…

Kuman v. Obama

As they observe, several courts in this district have found that "the trial court faced with a motion by…