From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sacramone v. Cranney

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
May 24, 2004
808 N.E.2d 1257 (Mass. App. Ct. 2004)

Summary

affirming grant of summary judgment for defendant lawyer accused of tortious interference in part because there was no evidence he encouraged the testator to incorporate informal mechanisms into her estate plan that he as a lawyer knew were unenforceable, in breach of his fiduciary relationship with her

Summary of this case from Spinnato v. Goldman

Opinion

No. 03-P-528.

May 24, 2004.


DECISION PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Sacramone v. Cranney

Appeals Court of Massachusetts
May 24, 2004
808 N.E.2d 1257 (Mass. App. Ct. 2004)

affirming grant of summary judgment for defendant lawyer accused of tortious interference in part because there was no evidence he encouraged the testator to incorporate informal mechanisms into her estate plan that he as a lawyer knew were unenforceable, in breach of his fiduciary relationship with her

Summary of this case from Spinnato v. Goldman
Case details for

Sacramone v. Cranney

Case Details

Full title:Robert Sacramone another vs. Milton E. Cranney, Jr., another

Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts

Date published: May 24, 2004

Citations

808 N.E.2d 1257 (Mass. App. Ct. 2004)
61 Mass. App. Ct. 1106

Citing Cases

Spinnato v. Goldman

Plainly such fraudulent conduct was a wrong upon the plaintiff as well as upon the testatrix.” Id. at 525, 81…