holding that in conducting review of a final administrative order, the Civil Service Board exercised quasijudicial functions, and that the exclusive remedy is by appeal pursuant to K.S.A. 60-2101 (Corrick) (now K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 60-2101[d])
Summary of this case from Woodard v. Bd. of County Com'rs of JeffersonNo. 71-1551.
October 10, 1972.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 458 F. 2d 1305.
holding that in conducting review of a final administrative order, the Civil Service Board exercised quasijudicial functions, and that the exclusive remedy is by appeal pursuant to K.S.A. 60-2101 (Corrick) (now K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 60-2101[d])
Summary of this case from Woodard v. Bd. of County Com'rs of Jeffersonhijacking plan included explicit agreement to cover up
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Twittystating that "[w]hile we agree that the presence of a third party commonly destroys the privilege, it does so only insofar as it is indicative of the intent of the parties that their communication not be confidential," and presence of client's father did not indicate such an intent
Summary of this case from Doe v. Massachusetts Dept. for Social ServicesFull title:ROSNER v. DUCHESS MUSIC CORP. et al
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 10, 1972
A debt is "liquidated" if it is "certain and fixed, either by the act and agreement of the parties or by…
St. John v. City of SalinaWhen the district court has appellate jurisdiction pursuant to statute to review an act of an administrative…