Summary
In Rodriguez v Aled Transp. Co. (147 AD2d 624), it appears that a motion to vacate an order denying the plaintiff's motion to restore the action to the trial calendar had been properly addressed to the justice who made the order, who then referred it to another justice.
Summary of this case from Carpenter v. BROWNING-FERRISOpinion
February 21, 1989
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Williams, J.).
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, with costs.
The order appealed from was vacated by a subsequent order of the same court (Hurowitz, J.), dated August 19, 1987 (see, Rodriguez v Aled Transp. Co., 147 A.D.2d 625 [decided herewith]). Bracken, J.P., Lawrence, Kooper and Sullivan, JJ., concur.