From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rodgers v. Watt

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 13, 1983
705 F.2d 1176 (9th Cir. 1983)

Summary

dismissing appeal sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Felshina v. Schweiker

Opinion

No. 80-3482.

May 13, 1983.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WRIGHT, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SKOPIL, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, FERGUSON, NELSON, CANBY, BOOCHEVER, NORRIS, and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.


ORDER FOR PUBLICATION

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case shall be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is hereby withdrawn.


Summaries of

Rodgers v. Watt

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 13, 1983
705 F.2d 1176 (9th Cir. 1983)

dismissing appeal sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction

Summary of this case from Felshina v. Schweiker
Case details for

Rodgers v. Watt

Case Details

Full title:R.E. RODGERS AND BARBARA RODGERS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JAMES G. WATT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 13, 1983

Citations

705 F.2d 1176 (9th Cir. 1983)

Citing Cases

Felshina v. Schweiker

Mizell v. Attorney General, 586 F.2d 942, 944 n. 2 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 967, 99 S.Ct. 1519,…

Allen v. Rimbach

Reconsideration motions are committed to the discretion of the trial court. Rodgers v. Watt, 722 F.2d 456,…