Summary
discussing how although it "would be inclined to reduce the [$5,190 in requested] attorneys' fees to a reasonable amount—likely in the hundreds of dollars," it would not do so given the Eighth Circuit's command to be "more deferential" when approving stipulated-to attorney's fees in a FLSA collective action settlement than when approving attorney's fees in a disputed case
Summary of this case from Johnson v. Thomson ReutersOpinion
No. 6:17-CV-06131
01-11-2019
CANDIE ROARK, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated PLAINTIFF v. NATIONAL PARK MOTORS, INC., et al. DEFENDANTS
JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the opinion and order entered in this case on this date, this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ADJUDGED this 11th day of January, 2019.
/s/_________
P.K. HOLMES, III
CHIEF U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE