Summary
suggesting complaint about drug use in the workplace would trigger § 6310
Summary of this case from McKenna v. Permanente Med. Grp., Inc.Opinion
No. 01-16232.
Argued and Submitted October 9, 2002.
Filed June 10, 2003. Amended August 14, 2003.
Stuart B. Esner (briefed) and Andrew N. Chang (argued), Esner Chang, Los Angeles, California, for the plaintiff-appellant.
Kathy M. Banke, Crosby, Heafey, Roach May, Oakland, California, for the defendants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California; Susan Yvonne Illston, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-99-04003-SI.
ORDER
Appellees' Request for Modification of Opinion filed on June 18, 2003, is GRANTED.
The Opinion filed on June 10, 2003, is amended as follows:
At page 7885, first full paragraph, line 9, delete the following sentence: "Of course, upon remand the district court may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law defamation claim. See Big Bear Lodging Ass'n v. Snow Summit, Inc., 182 F.3d 1096, 1106 n. 9 (9th Cir. 1999)."