From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Aug 30, 2011
Civil No. 3:10-cv-5801 KLS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 30, 2011)

Summary

finding the ALJ's discounting testimony concerning mental impairment claims were valid when the evidence in the record did not establish a legitimate excuse for failing to seek treatment

Summary of this case from Swinscoe v. Astrue

Opinion

Civil No. 3:10-cv-5801 KLS

08-30-2011

PEGGY ANN RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER of Social Security, Defendant.

Presented by: Rosemary Schurman, Attorney for Plaintiff Approved for Entry: s/Rosemary B. Schurman (signed per authorization) Kathy Reif Special Assistant US Attorney, OGC, SSA Attorney for Defendant


The Honorable

United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER FOR EAJA FEES, COSTS & EXPENSES


NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR

August 30, 2011 without oral argument


ORDER

Based upon the stipulation of the parties, the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §2412, and plaintiff's EAJA petition and the assignment of EAJA fees to plaintiff's attorney by plaintiff, it is hereby

ORDERED that EAJA attorney's fees of $6,394.26, costs of $8.50 (copies) and expenses of $18.78 (service by certified mail) for a total of $6,421.54 shall:

1) Be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 552 U.S. 1193 (2010) and delivered to plaintiff's counsel, Rosemary B. Schurman; however,
2) If the U.S. Department of the Treasury verifies to the Office of General Counsel that Plaintiff does not owe a debt, the government will honor Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA Fees and pay EAJA fees, costs and expenses directly to Rosemary B. Schurman.

Karen L. Strombom

United States Magistrate Judge

Presented by:

Rosemary Schurman,

Attorney for Plaintiff

Approved for Entry:

s/Rosemary B. Schurman (signed per authorization)

Kathy Reif

Special Assistant US Attorney, OGC, SSA

Attorney for Defendant


Summaries of

Richardson v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Aug 30, 2011
Civil No. 3:10-cv-5801 KLS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 30, 2011)

finding the ALJ's discounting testimony concerning mental impairment claims were valid when the evidence in the record did not establish a legitimate excuse for failing to seek treatment

Summary of this case from Swinscoe v. Astrue
Case details for

Richardson v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:PEGGY ANN RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

Date published: Aug 30, 2011

Citations

Civil No. 3:10-cv-5801 KLS (W.D. Wash. Aug. 30, 2011)

Citing Cases

Swinscoe v. Astrue

Regardless, the ALJ provided specific and legitimate reasons for affording reduced weight to Dr. Morse's…

Dale S. v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

While true, no formal diagnosis is required. Richardson v. Astrue, 2011 WL 3273255, at *7, n.5 (W.D. Wash.…