From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reames v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 13, 2013
No. 61091 (Nev. Mar. 13, 2013)

Summary

applying Nevada strangulation statute similar to Florida statute

Summary of this case from Dennis v. State

Opinion

No. 61091

03-13-2013

KIRK EVAN REAMES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of battery constituting domestic violence—strangulation. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge.

Appellant argues that while he was justifiably convicted of battery constituting domestic violence, insufficient evidence supported the strangulation allegation because the victim was not seriously injured. We disagree because the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, is sufficient to support the offense as charged beyond a reasonable doubt. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); McNair v. State, 108 Nev. 53, 56, 825 P.2d 571, 573 (1992). NRS 200.481(1)(a) defines battery as "any willful and unlawful use of force or violence upon the person of another." See NRS 33.018 (defining acts of domestic violence). That statute defines strangulation as "intentionally impeding the normal breathing or circulation of the blood by applying pressure on the throat or neck or by blocking the nose or mouth of another person in a manner that creates a risk of death or substantial bodily harm." NRS 200.481(1)(h). Here, the victim testified that appellant put his hands on her throat and squeezed for what "felt like an eternity." She could not breathe but did not lose consciousness. Appellant also placed a pillow over her face, preventing her from breathing. A medical expert testified that constant compression on blood vessels in the neck could render an individual unconscious in 10 seconds and dead in two minutes. Contrary to appellant's suggestion, injury to the victim is not required to prove the offense; rather, a risk of death or substantial bodily harm is sufficient. Because the evidence presented satisfies the definition of strangulation, appellant's argument lacks merit. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

______________________, J.

Gibbons
______________________, J.
Douglas
______________________, J.
Saitta
cc: Chief Judge, Eighth Judicial District Court

Hon. J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge

Clark County Public Defender

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Reames v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 13, 2013
No. 61091 (Nev. Mar. 13, 2013)

applying Nevada strangulation statute similar to Florida statute

Summary of this case from Dennis v. State
Case details for

Reames v. State

Case Details

Full title:KIRK EVAN REAMES, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 13, 2013

Citations

No. 61091 (Nev. Mar. 13, 2013)

Citing Cases

Dennis v. State

However, "injury to the victim is not required to prove" battery by strangulation. Reames v. State , 129 Nev.…