From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Quarterman v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 5, 2008
291 Ga. App. 603 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008)

Summary

holding that when the transcript is necessary for review and appellant omits it from the record on appeal, the appellate court must assume the judgment below was correct and affirm

Summary of this case from Belknap v. Belknap

Opinion

No. A08A0986.

DECIDED MAY 5, 2008. RECONSIDERATION DENIED MAY 21, 2008.

Transcript. Douglas State Court. Before Judge Dettmering.

James Quarterman, pro se.

Felecia Quarterman, pro se. Hartley, Rowe Fowler, Joseph H. Fowler, for appellee.


Following a jury trial, James and Felecia Quarterman (pro se) appeal an $8,741.97 judgment (plus $6,919.50 in attorney fees) awarded to Franklin Lee for damages they caused to property they leased from Lee. They assert as error Lee's alleged failure to comply with various sections of the Georgia Code applicable to security deposits, the trial court's admission of allegedly improper hearsay testimony, the alleged availability of newly discovered evidence, the trial court's alleged failure to properly charge the jury, and the denial of their motion for summary judgment (made orally after the trial). To resolve these issues requires us to review the evidence submitted at trial; however, the Quartermans elected not to file a transcript with their appeal.

The burden is on the party alleging error to show it affirmatively by the record. When the burden is not met, the judgment complained of is assumed to be correct and must be affirmed. Where[, as here,] the transcript is necessary for review and appellant omits it from the record on appeal, the appellate court must assume the judgment below was correct and affirm.

(Punctuation omitted.) Hosseini v. Donino. See Harden v. Young. As no statutorily authorized substitute for the trial transcript was submitted, we must affirm the trial court's judgment. See Alexander v. Jones. Judgment affirmed. Miller and Ellington, JJ., concur.

Hosseini v. Donino, 222 Ga. App. 697 (1) ( 475 SE2d 665) (1996).

Harden v. Young, 268 Ga. App. 619, 620 ( 606 SE2d 6) (2004).

Alexander v. Jones, 216 Ga. App. 360, 361 (1) ( 454 SE2d 539) (1995).


DECIDED MAY 5, 2008 — RECONSIDERATION DENIED MAY 21, 2008.


Summaries of

Quarterman v. Lee

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 5, 2008
291 Ga. App. 603 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008)

holding that when the transcript is necessary for review and appellant omits it from the record on appeal, the appellate court must assume the judgment below was correct and affirm

Summary of this case from Belknap v. Belknap
Case details for

Quarterman v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:QUARTERMAN et al. v. LEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 5, 2008

Citations

291 Ga. App. 603 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008)
662 S.E.2d 234

Citing Cases

Roberts v. Windsor Credit

Hosseini v. Donino, 222 Ga. App. 697 (1) ( 475 SE2d 665) (1996).Quarterman v. Lee, 291 Ga. App. 603 ( 662…

Thomas v. State

See id. Because the appellants have failed to have the trial transcripts filed with the trial court, and they…