From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pryor v. King

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 18, 1986
485 So. 2d 28 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Summary

holding that trial court was correct in not allowing appellant's wife, who was armed with appellant's power of attorney, to represent him in a quiet title action

Summary of this case from Forman v. State

Opinion

No. BH-377.

March 18, 1986.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Okaloosa County, Erwin Fleet, J.

Osborne W. Pryor, pro se.

Dale E. Rice, Crestview, for appellee.


Osborne W. Pryor, a convict, appeals final summary judgment quieting title to real property against him.

Pryor, a named defendant in the suit, showed in his pleadings that he was incarcerated. He also filed an appearance giving his wife his durable family power of attorney and requested that all correspondence to him be mailed to his prison address.

At the time of the summary judgment hearing, Pryor was incarcerated in state prison, and was neither present at the final summary judgment hearing nor represented there by counsel. His wife was precluded from participation, which he asserts was error.

Section 65.061(2), Florida Statutes (1985), concerning quiet title actions, provides that "a guardian ad litem shall not be appointed unless it shall affirmatively appear that the interest of minors, persons of unsound mind or convicts are involved." Our supreme court recognized, in regard to a predecessor statute, that the appointment of a guardian ad litem in quiet title actions has come to be regarded as essential in all cases involving minors, persons of unsound mind or convicts. McDaniel v. McElvy, 91 Fla. 770, 108 So. 820, 835 (1926).

We conclude that the trial court was correct in not allowing appellant's wife, who was armed with his power of attorney, to represent him in this case. Appellant Pryor, however, had the right to a guardian ad litem. We reverse and remand the final summary judgment as to Appellant Pryor. We require that a guardian ad litem be appointed to represent him in this litigation.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

JOANOS and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pryor v. King

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Mar 18, 1986
485 So. 2d 28 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

holding that trial court was correct in not allowing appellant's wife, who was armed with appellant's power of attorney, to represent him in a quiet title action

Summary of this case from Forman v. State
Case details for

Pryor v. King

Case Details

Full title:OSBORNE W. PRYOR, APPELLANT, v. J.R. KING, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Mar 18, 1986

Citations

485 So. 2d 28 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1986)

Citing Cases

Forman v. State

Ms. Leftow's power of attorney to act on her mother's behalf authorizes her to act as her mother's agent, not…