From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pitts v. Memorial Hospital

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 6, 2006
631 S.E.2d 830 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006)

Summary

concluding that when "usual and customary" is stated and a chargemaster sets forth the charges, there are no implied contractual obligations

Summary of this case from Nygaard v. Sioux Valley Hospitals

Opinion

A06A0234.

DECIDED JUNE 6, 2006.

Breach of contract, etc. Dougherty Superior Court. Before Judge Harvey, Senior Judge.

Vroon Crongeyer, Bryan A. Vroon, John W. Crongeyer, Brown, Scoccimaro Weaver, Ralph O. Scoccimaro, for appellants.

Langley Lee, Carl R. Langley, McKenna, Long Aldridge, Phillip A. Bradley, Samantha M. Rein, for appellees.


Following the dismissal of their suit against Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc. ("Phoebe Putney"), Bonnie Pitts, Sam Farkas, and Bobby Kendricks, Sr., appeal, contending that the trial court erred in dismissing their claims for (1) breach of contract, (2) violation of the Georgia Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, (3) unjust enrichment, (4) breach of fiduciary duty, and (5) declaratory and injunctive relief. Appellants' claims stem from their allegation that Phoebe Putney, which operates a nonprofit hospital, charges uninsured patients more than it charges patients covered by insurance or Medicare or Medicaid. Upon a review of the record, we have determined that this case is not materially different from Cox v. Athens Regional Med. Center, in which we affirmed the dismissal of identical claims made by similar plaintiffs. Therefore, we affirm the dismissal here.

Cox v. Athens Regional Med. Center, 279 Ga. App. 586 ( 631 SE2d 792) (2006).

Judgment affirmed. Mikell and Adams, JJ., concur.


DECIDED JUNE 6, 2006 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.


Summaries of

Pitts v. Memorial Hospital

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jun 6, 2006
631 S.E.2d 830 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006)

concluding that when "usual and customary" is stated and a chargemaster sets forth the charges, there are no implied contractual obligations

Summary of this case from Nygaard v. Sioux Valley Hospitals
Case details for

Pitts v. Memorial Hospital

Case Details

Full title:PITTS et al. v. PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jun 6, 2006

Citations

631 S.E.2d 830 (Ga. Ct. App. 2006)
631 S.E.2d 830

Citing Cases

Satterfield v. Southern Health System

Cox v. Athens Regional Med. Center, 279 Ga. App. 586 ( 631 SE2d 792) (2006).Pitts v. Phoebe Putney Mem.…

Nygaard v. Sioux Valley Hospitals

The conclusion that hospital price terms are not open when pre-set prices can be ascertained through…