Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter filed on October 23, 2020 [Docket No. 96]. The Recommendation states that objections to the Recommendation must be filed within fourteen days after its service on the parties. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The Recommendation was served on October 23, 2020. No party has objected to the Recommendation.

In the absence of an objection, the district court may review a magistrate judge's recommendation under any standard it deems appropriate. See Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d 1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) ("It does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when neither party objects to those findings."). In this matter, the Court has reviewed the Recommendation to satisfy itself that there is "no clear error on the face of the record." Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), Advisory Committee Notes. Based on this review, the Court has concluded that the Recommendation is a correct application of the facts and the law. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter [Docket No. 96] is ACCEPTED;

2. Defendant City of Aurora's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand [Docket No. 79] is DENIED; and

3. Motion for Partial Dismissal on Behalf of Defendants Tisdale, Zimmerman, McElroy, and Spano [Docket No. 81] is DENIED. DATED November 10, 2020.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

PHILIP A. BRIMMER

Chief United States District Judge