distinguishing its own decision in AFGE Local 1923 as involving neither review of an FLRA ruling nor a disclosure request pursuant to the Act, but rather a request directly under FOIA
Summary of this case from Federal Labor Relations Authority v. United States Department of Veterans AffairsNo. 88-72.
October 3, 1988.
C.A. 6th Cir. Motion of C. D. Ambrosia Trucking Co. et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 838 F. 2d 1445.
distinguishing its own decision in AFGE Local 1923 as involving neither review of an FLRA ruling nor a disclosure request pursuant to the Act, but rather a request directly under FOIA
Summary of this case from Federal Labor Relations Authority v. United States Department of Veterans Affairsnoting that in Keogh, the Supreme Court stated that the main purpose of the Interstate Commerce Act was the prevention of unjust discrimination, and that this required that ICC-approved rates be the sole source of a shipper's rights against a carrier
Summary of this case from Big Rivers Elec. Corp. v. Thorpeapplying filed tariff doctrine to insulate defendant from antitrust liability and rejecting competitor exception
Summary of this case from Teleconnect v. U.S. West CommunicationsFull title:PINNEY DOCK TRANSPORT CO. v. NORFOLK WESTERN RAILWAY CO. Et Al
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 3, 1988
A number of courts also ruled consistently with Farmers Home II that home addresses were disclosable under…
State of Ohio v. Louis Trauth DairyWhen the underlying cause of action is for violations of antitrust law, the Plaintiff must allege some…