Summary
affirming denial of successive motion for postconviction relief based on the claim that Phillips's sentence violates the Sixth and Eighth Amendments under Porter v. McCollum , 558 U.S. 30, 130 S.Ct. 447, 175 L.Ed.2d 398
Summary of this case from Phillips v. StateOpinion
No. SC11–472.
2012-06-21
Harry Franklin PHILLIPS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Israel Umberto Reyes, Judge–Case No. 83–435. Neal A. Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, M. Chance Meyer, Assistant CCR Counsel, and William M. Hennis, III, Litigation Director, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, and Sandra S. Jaggard, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Israel Umberto Reyes, Judge–Case No. 83–435.
Neal A. Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, M. Chance Meyer, Assistant CCR Counsel, and William M. Hennis, III, Litigation Director, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, FL, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, and Sandra S. Jaggard, Assistant Attorney General, Miami, FL, for Appellee.
Affirmed. See Walton v. State, 77 So.3d 639 (Fla.2011).
It is so ordered.