From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Philadelphia v. Farrell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 9, 1965
209 A.2d 867 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1965)

Summary

In City of Philadelphia v. Farrell, 205 Pa. Super. 263, 209 A.2d 867 (1965), it was determined that membership in the armed forces entitled exemption from payment of wage tax because it represented a sacrifice which should be recognized as a matter of public policy.

Summary of this case from Equitable Life Assurance Soc. v. Murphy

Opinion

March 18, 1965.

April 9, 1965.

Constitutional Law — Taxation — Uniformity — Wage tax — Ordinances — Exemptions — Members of armed forces resident in city — Persons whose employers give information to city.

In this action in assumpsit, in which it appeared that the plaintiff city sought to recover from defendant, who was employed at a federal installation in Philadelphia and had failed to file wage tax returns for five years, the principal sum and, also, a fine of $100 for each of the years involved; that defendant contended that the ordinances in question violated article IX, §§ 1 and 2, of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, asserting that the tax imposed was not uniform because it exempted salaries of members of the armed forces who were residents of Philadelphia and, also, because the municipal authorities exempted certain taxpayers from paying interest and penalties in exchange for information received from the employers of such persons; that defendant further averred that plaintiff was not entitled to recover any fine because defendant was brought before a magistrate (after the violations had occurred) and was fined the sum of $100 and costs; and that the court below, holding that the basis for classification in this case was entirely reasonable, and that the ordinances were not invalid, entered judgment for plaintiff on the pleadings (limited to the principal sum claimed because it could not be ascertained from the pleadings whether the summons in the proceeding before the magistrate had charged violation for only one year or for each of the five years involved); it was Held on appeal by defendant that the order of the court below should be affirmed.

Before ERVIN, P.J., WRIGHT, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, and HOFFMAN, JJ. (FLOOD, J., absent).

Appeal, No. 427, Oct. T., 1964, from order of County Court of Philadelphia, Dec. T., 1959, No. 10397-B, in case of City of Philadelphia v. Louis V. Farrell. Order affirmed.

Same case in court below: 35 Pa. D. C. 2d 177.

Assumpsit.

Judgment entered for plaintiff on pleadings, opinion by SCHWARTZ, J. Defendant appealed.

Louis V. Farrell, appellant, in propria persona, submitted a brief.

Gerald Garnish, Assistant City Solicitor, with him Matthew W. Bullock, Jr., Deputy City Solicitor, and

Edward G. Bauer, Jr., City Solicitor, for City of Philadelphia, appellee.


Argued March 18, 1965.


The order of the County Court of Philadelphia is affirmed on the opinion of Judge BENJAMIN W. SCHWARTZ for the court below, reported at 35 Pa. D. C. 2d 177.


Summaries of

Philadelphia v. Farrell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Apr 9, 1965
209 A.2d 867 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1965)

In City of Philadelphia v. Farrell, 205 Pa. Super. 263, 209 A.2d 867 (1965), it was determined that membership in the armed forces entitled exemption from payment of wage tax because it represented a sacrifice which should be recognized as a matter of public policy.

Summary of this case from Equitable Life Assurance Soc. v. Murphy
Case details for

Philadelphia v. Farrell

Case Details

Full title:Philadelphia v. Farrell, Appellant

Court:Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 9, 1965

Citations

209 A.2d 867 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1965)
209 A.2d 867

Citing Cases

Lang v. City of Philadelphia

Appellant advances the theory that the exemption of the earnings of members of the armed forces under the…

Equitable Life Assurance Soc. v. Murphy

Moreover, the court concluded that while revenues derived from taxing occupations of minors would be small,…