denying the defendant city's motion for summary judgment where an officer's incident report stated that the defendant officer's action was consistent with their training
Summary of this case from Reilly v. City of ProvidenceNo. 97-1270.
April 3, 1998.
D.Colo.
Affirmed.
denying the defendant city's motion for summary judgment where an officer's incident report stated that the defendant officer's action was consistent with their training
Summary of this case from Reilly v. City of Providencereversing summary judgment for employer based on direct evidence of discrimination, in the form of witness co-worker's testimony about comments he heard from supervisor about plaintiff
Summary of this case from Johnson v. Weld County, Coloradostating "such legal matters as the frivolousness of a claim or the impropriety of a discovery request, which are 'peculiarly [within] the province of lawyers,' would not, without specific findings implicating knowing participation, support Rule 11 sanctions against a party" (citing White v. General Motors Corp., 908 F.2d 675, 686 (10th Cir. 1990))
Summary of this case from Byrne v. Nezhatlisting section 6213 as a statute in which the United States has waived its sovereign immunity
Summary of this case from Soto v. Director, V.I. Bureau of Internal Revenuelisting section 6213 as a statute in which the United States has waived its sovereign immunity
Summary of this case from Elmes v. Commissionerlisting section 6213 as a statute in which the United States has waived its sovereign immunity
Summary of this case from Patterson v. U.S. V.I.listing section 6213 as a statute in which the United States has waived its sovereign immunity
Summary of this case from Barclay Assocs., Inc. v. Internal Revenue Serv.listing section 6213 as a statute in which the United States has waived its sovereign immunity
Summary of this case from McGrogan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenuenoting that “such legal matters as the frivolousness of a claim or the impropriety of a discovery request, which are peculiarly [within] the province of lawyers, would not, without specific findings implicating knowing participation, support Rule 11 sanctions against a party”
Summary of this case from In re Bankatlantic Bancorp, Inc. Sec. Litig.Full title:Phelps v. U.S. West, Inc
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Date published: Apr 3, 1998
Because Sacoman pursued an appeal, however, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit set out…
Ortiz v. ApfelJudicial review of a decision by the Commissioner is limited to determining whether the administrative record…