holding that no prejudicial error occurred from the denial of the defendant's motion to suppress when the evidence sought to be suppressed duplicated other evidence properly admitted in evidence
Summary of this case from State v. Maxwell1995.
holding that no prejudicial error occurred from the denial of the defendant's motion to suppress when the evidence sought to be suppressed duplicated other evidence properly admitted in evidence
Summary of this case from State v. Maxwellracketeering properly ranked higher than its predicate offense
Summary of this case from State v. Ibarra–RuizFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
Indeed, the court properly told the parties that they would "revisit the issue" if need be—a fair and…
State v. TurnerId. at 438. We again addressed the application of ORS 136.060 in State v. Coleman, 130 Or. App. 656, 883 P.2d…