From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Sep 24, 2003
336 Or. 16 (Or. 2003)

Summary

rejecting assignment of error that mischaracterized trial court's ruling

Summary of this case from Reeves v. Reeves

Opinion

September 24, 2003


Summaries of

Petitions for Review

Oregon Supreme Court
Sep 24, 2003
336 Or. 16 (Or. 2003)

rejecting assignment of error that mischaracterized trial court's ruling

Summary of this case from Reeves v. Reeves

noting that ORS 109.119 "provides substantive requirements for actions in which a nonparent seeks custody or guardianship of a minor child over the objection of a legal parent"

Summary of this case from Epler v. Epler

noting that ORS 109.119 “provides substantive requirements for actions in which a nonparent seeks custody or guardianship of a minor child over the objection of a legal parent”

Summary of this case from Epler v. Epler

considering extent to which proffering party relied on evidence at trial

Summary of this case from State v. Simon

involving a request for a new trial because of attorney misconduct to which no objection had been made during trial; reasoning that “[t]he general rule is that the denial of a motion for a new trial is not reviewable on appeal when the motion is based on alleged errors committed during the trial” and that “it is incumbent on a party to make a proper objection during trial and to assign error to the ruling on that objection”

Summary of this case from Greenwood Prods., Inc. v. Greenwood Forest Prods., Inc.

discussing principle

Summary of this case from Frontgate Properties, LLC v. Bennett

explaining that a party who believes that an error occurs during trial should object and, on appeal, assign error to the ruling on the objection

Summary of this case from State v. Sundberg

incorporating additional conditions for permanent placement proceeding

Summary of this case from State ex Rel. Juv. Dept. v. Smith

describing circumstances in which Court of Appeals has applied procedural rule prospectively only

Summary of this case from Corcoran v. Board of Nursing
Case details for

Petitions for Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Sep 24, 2003

Citations

336 Or. 16 (Or. 2003)
77 P.3d 319

Citing Cases

State v. Leahy

"State ex rel Juv. Dept. v. Sauer, 189 Or. App. 78, 73 P.3d 293 (2003); State v. McKinzie, 186 Or. App. 384,…

Oregon Public Employees' Retirement Board v. Simat, Helliesen & Eichner

We recently endorsed the similarly "holistic" approach in an analogous context. In Pioneer Resources LLC v.…