Summary
looking to former ORS 19.010, renumbered as ORS 19.205, to determine whether order in adoption case was appealable
Summary of this case from A. M. v. N. E. D. (In re Adoption of A. G. D.)Opinion
1993.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1993
317 Or. 583 (Or. 1993)
Summaries of
Petitions for Review
Oregon Supreme Court
Jan 1, 1993
317 Or. 583 (Or. 1993)
looking to former ORS 19.010, renumbered as ORS 19.205, to determine whether order in adoption case was appealable
Summary of this case from A. M. v. N. E. D. (In re Adoption of A. G. D.)traveling employee rule is not limited to employees who travel overnight
Summary of this case from In re ScardiCase details for
Petitions for Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1993
Citations
317 Or. 583 (Or. 1993)
Citing Cases
Saif v. Vanlanen
DEITS, P.J. Claimant requests reconsideration of our decision in this case, arguing that our reliance on…
Edwards v. Merle West Medical CenterWe review a ruling whether contractual language is ambiguous for errors of law. Hauge v. Vanderhave, 121 Or.…