Summary
using same standard to determine whether a person is in "custody" for federal constitutional purposes as for state constitution
Summary of this case from State v. WarnerOpinion
1995.
using same standard to determine whether a person is in "custody" for federal constitutional purposes as for state constitution
Summary of this case from State v. Warner1995.
using same standard to determine whether a person is in "custody" for federal constitutional purposes as for state constitution
Summary of this case from State v. WarnerFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1995
We have followed Threet in more recent cases. Thus, in Strother and Strother, 130 Or. App. 624, 628, 883 P.2d…
Zidell Marine Corp. v. West Painting, Inc.Or Laws 1991, ch 845, § 9. There is a presumption that historical facts involving the subject matter of…