concluding that “the evidence about the child's character for truthfulness directly counterbalances the misleading or unfair impression created for the jury by the admission of inadmissible evidence about defendant's character for truthfulness”
Summary of this case from State v. Henderson-Laird1996.
concluding that “the evidence about the child's character for truthfulness directly counterbalances the misleading or unfair impression created for the jury by the admission of inadmissible evidence about defendant's character for truthfulness”
Summary of this case from State v. Henderson-Lairdtraining and expertise of officer relevant to finding subjective probable cause
Summary of this case from State v. BickfordFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1996
However, at least one case construing the then-applicable version of the statute, ORS 659.425 (1989), held…
Varner v. EvesWhile both contentions are relevant in establishing whether the parties intended the fee agreement to be the…