assuming show-up shortly after crime was unduly suggestive, witness identification had independent, reliable source, where she had had a good opportunity to observe him during the crime, struggling with him for about one minute in a welllighted area, and provided an accurate description of him immediately after the crime
Summary of this case from State v. LawsonDecember 23, 1986.
assuming show-up shortly after crime was unduly suggestive, witness identification had independent, reliable source, where she had had a good opportunity to observe him during the crime, struggling with him for about one minute in a welllighted area, and provided an accurate description of him immediately after the crime
Summary of this case from State v. LawsonFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Dec 23, 1986
(Emphasis supplied.) In McGill v. SAIF, 81 Or. App. 210, 724 P.2d 905, rev den 302 Or. 461 (1986), we said:…
State v. Lawson, and had ample opportunity to view him at the time of the crime); State v. Najibi, 150 Or. App. 194, 199,…