noting that ORS 654.025(c) allows only one punishment for a single "incident" or "state of facts or condition" that may violate multiple rules
Summary of this case from Occupational Safety & Health Div. v. Loy Clark Pipeline, Co.1994.
noting that ORS 654.025(c) allows only one punishment for a single "incident" or "state of facts or condition" that may violate multiple rules
Summary of this case from Occupational Safety & Health Div. v. Loy Clark Pipeline, Co.stating same in context of the accrual of a securities claim
Summary of this case from Willms v. Amerititle, Inc.Full title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
We have twice at least implicitly assumed otherwise. See Ainslie v. First Interstate Bank, 148 Or App 162,…
Willms v. Amerititle, Inc.Penuel , 127 Or. App. at 200, 872 P.2d 28. That question is "normally a question for the jury unless only one…