holding that service was proper where a petition was sent by certified mail addressed to defendant City of Asheville but received by a mail clerk, which receipt was held to be acknowledged by the clerk's signature
Summary of this case from Fender v. Deaton1983
holding that service was proper where a petition was sent by certified mail addressed to defendant City of Asheville but received by a mail clerk, which receipt was held to be acknowledged by the clerk's signature
Summary of this case from Fender v. Deatonproviding for service by registered or certified mail
Summary of this case from Humphrey v. SinnottFull title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1983
Defendant attempts to further distinguish the case at hand, however, as unique in that it deals with service…
Matheson v. City of Asheville"[S]ubstantial compliance is all that is required in meeting the boundary requirements set forth in the…