From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 26, 1983
308 N.C. 544 (N.C. 1983)

Summary

affirming the validity of the annexation ordinance

Summary of this case from Duke Power Co. v. City of High Point

Opinion


302 S.E.2d 885 (N.C. 1983) 308 N.C. 544 John T. McKENZIE, Jr., et al. v. CITY OF HIGH POINT. Supreme Court of North Carolina. May 26, 1983

       Herbert L. Hyde, Asheville, for plaintiff.

       Knox Walker, High Point, for defendant.

       Plaintiff's petition for discretionary review, N.C.App., 301 N.E.2d 129, under G.S. 7A-31. Denied.


Summaries of

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Supreme Court of North Carolina
May 26, 1983
308 N.C. 544 (N.C. 1983)

affirming the validity of the annexation ordinance

Summary of this case from Duke Power Co. v. City of High Point
Case details for

Petitions for Discretionary Review

Case Details

Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: May 26, 1983

Citations

308 N.C. 544 (N.C. 1983)
308 N.C. 544

Citing Cases

Williams v. Burlington Industries, Inc.

Cf. In re Butler, 60 N.C. App. 563, 299 S.E.2d 672, cert. denied, 308 N.C. 191, 302 S.E.2d 242 (1983)…

Town of Ayden v. Town of Winterville

Similarly, in Joyner v. Town of Weaverville, 94 N.C. App. 588, 380 S.E.2d 536 (1989), this Court held that…