Summary
discussing when prior inconsistent statements are admissible as substantive evidence
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. HarrellOpinion
1996
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1996
544 Pa. 627 (Pa. 1996)
Summaries of
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1996
544 Pa. 627 (Pa. 1996)
discussing when prior inconsistent statements are admissible as substantive evidence
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. HarrellCase details for
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1996
Citations
544 Pa. 627 (Pa. 1996)
Citing Cases
Commonwealth v. Harrell
(Id.) The trial court's order applied only to statements signed, adopted or otherwise shown to be…
Commonwealth v. Al SiyamirCommonwealth v. Muntz, 428 Pa.Super. 99, 630 A.2d 51, 55 (1993). See also Pa.R.A.P. 1911, 1921-23;…