stating entry of pre-trial nonsuit on plaintiffs' contract claim was error; what court did cannot be characterized as grant of nonsuit; timely post-trial motion to remove nonsuit was unnecessary
Summary of this case from Murphy v. Int'l Druidic Soc'y1994
stating entry of pre-trial nonsuit on plaintiffs' contract claim was error; what court did cannot be characterized as grant of nonsuit; timely post-trial motion to remove nonsuit was unnecessary
Summary of this case from Murphy v. Int'l Druidic Soc'yFull title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
Appellant is correct that a compulsory nonsuit is the proper way for a court to dismiss a plaintiff's case…
Ray v. Armstrong DevelopersSee Sterling v. Fineman, 428 Pa. Super. 233, 630 A.2d 1224 (1993), appeal denied, 538 Pa. 674, 649 A.2d 675…