Summary
holding that a 6% deviation from the minimum lot size requirement is not de minimis as a matter of law
Summary of this case from Reid v. Upper Augusta Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Opinion
1992
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1992
529 Pa. 665 (Pa. 1992)
Summaries of
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Jan 1, 1992
529 Pa. 665 (Pa. 1992)
holding that a 6% deviation from the minimum lot size requirement is not de minimis as a matter of law
Summary of this case from Reid v. Upper Augusta Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Case details for
Petitions for Allowance of Appeal
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR ALLOWANCE OF APPEAL
Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
Citations
529 Pa. 665 (Pa. 1992)
Citing Cases
Swemley v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Windsor
Id. at 110. Similarly, in Leonard v. Zoning Hearing Board of the City of Bethlehem, 583 A.2d 11 (Pa.Commw.…
Reid v. Upper Augusta Twp. Zoning Hearing Bd.Rather, while there is no precise mathematical percentage that marks the line between de minimis and…