In Perrine v. Hotchkiss, 58 Barb. 77, the court said: "The law allows a party who becomes surety for another, by way of indorsement, or otherwise, to agree upon a certain price for the use of his credit.
Summary of this case from Grannis v. TempleArgued December 10, 1874
Decided December 22, 1874
Oscar Craig for the appellant.
J.H. Camp for the respondent.
Agree to affirm, on opinion of TALCOTT, J., in court below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
In Perrine v. Hotchkiss, 58 Barb. 77, the court said: "The law allows a party who becomes surety for another, by way of indorsement, or otherwise, to agree upon a certain price for the use of his credit.
Summary of this case from Grannis v. TempleFull title:WILLIAM D. PERRINE, Respondent, v . HIRAM G. HOTCHKISS, Appellant
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Dec 22, 1874
The rule for estimating the services should have been their actual value, and not such value as the services…
United American Life Insurance Company v. WilleyThe authorities upon the subject are fully reviewed in the cases cited and in the case of Leavitt v. De…