Defendant was involved in a shootout in an upper Manhattan bar. Although there was no direct evidence that defendant's gun fired the fatal shot, the People's evidence demonstrated that defendant fired in the direction of the deceased. Defendant was convicted of depraved indifference murder, but acquitted of intentional murder and two counts of attempted murder relating to other victims.

We find the evidence legally sufficient to support the conviction. Defendant and his cohorts, all of whom fired shots in the crowded bar, shared a "`community of purpose'", such that defendant could be found guilty even if he did not fire the fatal shot (People v Allah, 71 N.Y.2d 830, 832; People v Brathwaite, 63 N.Y.2d 839). Since the court instructed the jury to consider the lesser included offenses only after they resolved the murder counts (see, People v Boettcher, 69 N.Y.2d 174), and since defendant was convicted only of the top count of murder, defendant's challenge to the manner in which lesser included offenses were submitted to the jury is speculative as well as academic.

We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.