In Robles-Mejia, the court noted that in its plea allocution, defendant stated "no" when asked "if any other promises or threats had been made to force or induce him to plead guilty" Id. at 1219(a).
Summary of this case from People v. GeorgeNo. 2430/01.
April 16, 2010.
Crimes — Right to Counsel — Effective Representation — Prejudice to Client.
In Robles-Mejia, the court noted that in its plea allocution, defendant stated "no" when asked "if any other promises or threats had been made to force or induce him to plead guilty" Id. at 1219(a).
Summary of this case from People v. GeorgeFull title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK v. BONAFACIO ROBLES-MEJIA, Defendant
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York, Bronx County
Date published: Apr 16, 2010
Under Padilla, Attorney Pogrow's purported advice, to wit, that there were no immigration consequences, that…
People v. WilsonIn fact, the record shows that “defendant was ... solely motivated to plead guilty in order to avoid—at all…