Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 3, 1977, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment for failure to provide a speedy trial. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and indictment reinstated. We find here that the four- and one-half-year delay in bringing this matter on for trial was occasioned by defendant's absconding after his arraignment in the Criminal Court. The inference is inescapable, from his own admission, that he was living with his codefendant, who was held for the Grand Jury after a Criminal Court hearing which he avoided, and that he was aware of his indictment and avoided judicial process. "We find no merit in the argument that appellant was deprived of his right to a speedy trial; his failure to appear in court as scheduled, and his unexplained whereabouts thereafter, were the prime causes of the delay, which, in any event, did not prejudice him (see People v Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442)." (People v Washington, 49 A.D.2d 914; see, also, People v Morton, 22 N.Y.2d 674, revg 28 A.D.2d 913 on the dissenting opn of Justices Rabin and Nolan at the App. Div.) Hopkins, J.P., Latham, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.