In People v. May (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 194, 198 [218 Cal.Rptr. 152], Division Six of the appellate court held that the Disbrow, supra, exclusionary rule did not survive article I, section 28, subdivision (d).
Summary of this case from People v. MarzettPreviously published at 182 Cal.App.3d 850
Opinions on pages 178-210 omitted.
REVIEWS GRANTED
In People v. May (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 194, 198 [218 Cal.Rptr. 152], Division Six of the appellate court held that the Disbrow, supra, exclusionary rule did not survive article I, section 28, subdivision (d).
Summary of this case from People v. MarzettFull title:The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Michael Dennis MAY, Defendant and…
Court:California Court of Appeals, Second District, Sixth Division
Date published: Sep 16, 1985
In footnote 4, it specifically states: "The question whether article I, section 15 may be invoked to exclude…
People v. MayIn Bank. Prior Report: Cal.App., 218 Cal.Rptr. 152. Appellant's petition for review…