In People v Chupp, 200 Mich. App. 45, 49; 503 N.W.2d 698 (1993), this Court held that under the then-existing statutory definition of "victim" contained in subsection 16(1), a law enforcement agency was not a victim where "its members decided to expend $1,400 for the drug deal with defendant.
Summary of this case from People v. CriglerDocket No. 144536.
Submitted January 13, 1993, at Grand Rapids.
Decided June 7, 1993, at 9:35 A.M. Leave to appeal denied, 443 Mich. 876.
In People v Chupp, 200 Mich. App. 45, 49; 503 N.W.2d 698 (1993), this Court held that under the then-existing statutory definition of "victim" contained in subsection 16(1), a law enforcement agency was not a victim where "its members decided to expend $1,400 for the drug deal with defendant.
Summary of this case from People v. CriglerFull title:PEOPLE v CHUPP
Court:Michigan Court of Appeals
Date published: Jun 7, 1993
The term "conviction" must be applied as expressly defined. People v. Chupp, 200 Mich. App. 45, 49; 503…
People v. LettsA court may order restitution for losses to a victim of a defendant's course of conduct that gives rise to…