From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Cheek

Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District
Sep 28, 1999
75 Cal.App.4th 282 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)

Summary

In People v. Cheek, supra, 75 Cal.App.4th 282, we held that the trial court had erred by precluding Cheek from calling and cross-examining witnesses at the annual show cause hearing (§ 6605, but that the issue was moot because Cheek's initial commitment had expired.

Summary of this case from Butler v. Superior Court of Santa Cruz County

Opinion

H019064 (Santa Cruz County Super. Ct. No. ME-30)

Filed September 28, 1999


REVIEW GRANTED

Reprinted without change in the Review Granted Opinions Pamphlet to permit tracking pending review and disposition by the Supreme Court.


Summaries of

People v. Cheek

Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District
Sep 28, 1999
75 Cal.App.4th 282 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)

In People v. Cheek, supra, 75 Cal.App.4th 282, we held that the trial court had erred by precluding Cheek from calling and cross-examining witnesses at the annual show cause hearing (§ 6605, but that the issue was moot because Cheek's initial commitment had expired.

Summary of this case from Butler v. Superior Court of Santa Cruz County
Case details for

People v. Cheek

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL THOMAS CHEEK, Defendant…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District

Date published: Sep 28, 1999

Citations

75 Cal.App.4th 282 (Cal. Ct. App. 1999)
89 Cal. Rptr. 2d 125

Citing Cases

People v. Superior Court of Santa Cruz Cnty. (Butler)

Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) and were committed to the custody of the State Department of Mental Health (DMH)…

Butler v. Superior Court of Santa Cruz County

Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.) and were committed to the custody of the State Department of Mental Health (DMH)…