In Banks, for example, a California Court of Appeal determined that advanced publicity is a necessary requirement to a constitutionally sufficient sobriety checkpoint.
Summary of this case from United States v. Ziegler1992
Reprinted without change in 16 Cal.App.4th 1188, to permit tracking pending review by the Supreme Court.
In Banks, for example, a California Court of Appeal determined that advanced publicity is a necessary requirement to a constitutionally sufficient sobriety checkpoint.
Summary of this case from United States v. ZieglerFull title:People v. Banks
Court:Court of Appeal of California
Date published: Jan 1, 1992
At issue in this appeal is whether the guidelines set up for the Fort Ord vehicle checkpoint were sufficient…
State v. DowneyFirst, the appellant points out that the government did not publicize the roadblock before its institution.…