Summary
affirming portion of district court's order imposing Rule 11 sanctions against attorney for filing claim with no factual basis in the amount of $1,000.00
Summary of this case from Sunday's Child, LLC v. Irongate Azrep BW LLCOpinion
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Editorial Note:
This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Guam, Appellate Division Unpingco, Munson, and Goodwin, Presiding.
Before BEEZER, KLEINFELD, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Antonio Mantanona Tedtaotao appeals the District Court of Guam, Appellate Division's affirmance of his conviction before the Guam Superior Court for first degree criminal sexual conduct. His counsel submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record discloses no issues for review. Accordingly, we GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the judgment.