From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People ex Rel. Jones v. Enright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1919
187 App. Div. 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Summary

In People v. Jones (1919), 290 Ill. 603, the evidence was held insufficient to support a robbery conviction where the defendant had stealthily removed a pocket-book from his intoxicated victim's pocket and transferred it to his own.

Summary of this case from People v. Patton

Opinion

February, 1919.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Jenks, P.J., Mills, Rich, Kelly and Jaycox, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

People ex Rel. Jones v. Enright

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 1, 1919
187 App. Div. 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

In People v. Jones (1919), 290 Ill. 603, the evidence was held insufficient to support a robbery conviction where the defendant had stealthily removed a pocket-book from his intoxicated victim's pocket and transferred it to his own.

Summary of this case from People v. Patton

In People v. Jones, 290 Ill. 603, 125 N.E. 256 (1919) and in Hall v. People, 171 Ill. 540, 49 N.E. 495 (1898), cited by defendant, the court distinguished theft from robbery and held that when property is taken by stealth from a person who is unaware of the taking, the essential elements of robbery are not established.

Summary of this case from People v. Lewis
Case details for

People ex Rel. Jones v. Enright

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. WILLIAM A. JONES, Respondent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1919

Citations

187 App. Div. 940 (N.Y. App. Div. 1919)

Citing Cases

People v. Patton

) Because there was no injury to the victim, no violence or struggle, and no intent to obtain or retain the…

People v. Lewis

Neither can it be said that a police officer consents to an attack by casually pretending to be an…