From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Patterson v. Patterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 1948
273 App. Div. 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Summary

In Patterson v. Patterson, 164 Kan. 501, 190 P.2d 887 [(1948)], the plaintiff filed a motion to vacate as void, a judgment of divorce granted her husband on his unverified cross-petition some thirteen years before.

Summary of this case from Smith v. State

Opinion

April 5, 1948.


In an action for divorce, order denying plaintiff's motion to amend the final decree modified by striking out everything following the words "hereby is" and by substituting in place thereof a paragraph providing that the motion be granted to the extent of directing an addition to the final decree of a decretal paragraph stating that inasmuch as the plaintiff has furnished proof of the sale of the Scarsdale property the defendant shall pay the plaintiff $350 per month commencing December 12, 1947. As thus modified, the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, without costs and without prejudice to any further application, as plaintiff may be advised. We construe the final decree as requiring an increase in the award as of the date of proof of sale of the real property; and we hold that plaintiff's affidavit herein is sufficient proof. The papers do not disclose grounds for a further increase in the award. Lewis, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Patterson v. Patterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 1948
273 App. Div. 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

In Patterson v. Patterson, 164 Kan. 501, 190 P.2d 887 [(1948)], the plaintiff filed a motion to vacate as void, a judgment of divorce granted her husband on his unverified cross-petition some thirteen years before.

Summary of this case from Smith v. State
Case details for

Patterson v. Patterson

Case Details

Full title:NAN R. PATTERSON, Respondent-Appellant, v. JEROME PATTERSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 5, 1948

Citations

273 App. Div. 968 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Taylor v. McKune

We conclude the answer is no; none of the deficiencies or omissions deprive the district court of…

Stewart v. Secretary of Corrections

We conclude the answer is no; none of the deficiencies or omissions deprived the district court of…