From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Panzarella v. Multiple Parking Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 25, 1997
238 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Summary

rejecting plaintiff's argument that his award of $160,000 for future pain and suffering materially deviated from reasonable compensation, though plaintiff experienced measurable grip deficiencies, causing his left arm to dystrophy

Summary of this case from Nivar v. Sadler

Opinion

April 25, 1997

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Callahan, Doerr and Fallon, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that it had no actual or constructive notice of a dangerous icy condition on the parking lot where plaintiff fell and that it was not afforded a reasonable time after a temperature fluctuation that created the icy condition to exercise due care to correct the situation. The evidence establishes that the ice on the parking lot was "visible and apparent" and existed "for a sufficient length of time prior to the accident to permit defendant's employees to discover and remedy it" ( Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 837). According to the testimony at trial, between three and nine hours passed from the time the ice formed until plaintiff's accident, and defendant's maintenance worker did not place rock salt on the parking lot until 45 minutes before plaintiff's accident. Thus, we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence.

Supreme Court properly refused to charge the jury on implied assumption of the risk. The evidence at trial establishes that, at the time of her fall, plaintiff was not aware of the ice ( see, Pisciotta v. Parisi, 155 A.D.2d 422; Farina v. A.R.A. Servs., 151 A.D.2d 456).

Finally, the jury award of $160,000 for future pain and suffering does not deviate materially from what would be reasonable compensation ( see, CPLR 5501 [c]; see also, Kotopoulos v. Nathan Hale Gardens, 235 A.D.2d 276). Plaintiff sustained a fractured distal radius and was forced to undergo two surgical procedures on her left wrist. She has permanent measurable deficiencies in her grip and pinch strength as a result. There are scars on her wrist, and her left arm has atrophied so that it is smaller than her right arm. Her wrist is permanently deformed and radiates inward. She will continue to suffer pain and discomfort as a result of weather and hand usage. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Gorski, J. — Damages.)


Summaries of

Panzarella v. Multiple Parking Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 25, 1997
238 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

rejecting plaintiff's argument that his award of $160,000 for future pain and suffering materially deviated from reasonable compensation, though plaintiff experienced measurable grip deficiencies, causing his left arm to dystrophy

Summary of this case from Nivar v. Sadler
Case details for

Panzarella v. Multiple Parking Services, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DOROTHY M. PANZARELLA, Respondent, v. MULTIPLE PARKING SERVICES, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
661 N.Y.S.2d 139

Citing Cases

Williams v. State

Claimant denied that the parking lot had been salted and stated that it was covered in ice when she fell, but…

Perkins v. Gervis

The ice itself was present for more than sufficient time for CVS to have discovered it and cured the defect.…