stating both statutory and guideline increases may be imposed if defendant and accomplice used different weapons as part of joint undertaking
Summary of this case from U.S. v. DiazNo. 99-449.
January 24, 2000, October TERM, 1999.
C.A. 2d Cir. Motion of National Association for Rights Protection and Advocacy et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 166 F. 3d 507.
stating both statutory and guideline increases may be imposed if defendant and accomplice used different weapons as part of joint undertaking
Summary of this case from U.S. v. DiazFull title:OKUNIEFF v. SKOMOROSSKY ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jan 24, 2000
"`Only in rare circumstances can a private party be viewed as a `state actor' for section 1983 purposes.'"…
Vazquez v. MarcianoThus, Lippe cannot be considered a State actor, whether under the compulsion test, the close nexus/joint…