From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norman v. Wrolstad

United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division
Jun 7, 2007
Case No. 1:06-cv-010 (D.N.D. Jun. 7, 2007)

Summary

refusing to disclose a prisoner's identity for safety concerns

Summary of this case from Randle v. Franklin

Opinion

Case No. 1:06-cv-010.

June 7, 2007


ORDER


The trial scheduled for August 13, 2007, is cancelled as is the final pretrial conference scheduled for August 3, 2007. The court will reschedule the trial and final pretrial conference as necessary at dates yet to be determined. The court, pursuant to its discussions with the parties during the conference on May 18, 2007, is suspending the Plaintiff's deadline for filing a response to the Defendants' pending motion for Summary Judgment. Once the court has addressed the Plaintiff's myriad of discovery requests, it shall advise him when his response to the Defendants' motion is due.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Norman v. Wrolstad

United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division
Jun 7, 2007
Case No. 1:06-cv-010 (D.N.D. Jun. 7, 2007)

refusing to disclose a prisoner's identity for safety concerns

Summary of this case from Randle v. Franklin
Case details for

Norman v. Wrolstad

Case Details

Full title:James Norman, Plaintiff, v. Dan Wrolstad, et. al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. North Dakota, Southwestern Division

Date published: Jun 7, 2007

Citations

Case No. 1:06-cv-010 (D.N.D. Jun. 7, 2007)

Citing Cases

Randle v. Franklin

Maintaining confidentiality of prison employees and ensuring prison safety are both sufficient reasons for…

Ivey v. MSOP

Each argument has some merit. Courts often consider institutional security when evaluating discovery requests…