Summary
discussing Pennsylvania law and concluding that a UTP claim involving a loan transaction had to be dismissed on parol evidence grounds
Summary of this case from Davids v. Riverview Homes, Inc. (In re Davids)Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1762
07-11-2012
STEVEN NICOLAIDES, ET AL. v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION formerly known as COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., ET AL.
ORDER
AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2012, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 16.), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Motion is GRANTED as to all claims by Plaintiff Steven Nicolaides.
2. The Motion is GRANTED as to all claims by Plaintiff Roberta Nicolaides with the exception of Plaintiff Roberta Nicolaides's claim in Count I for failure to provide sufficient notices of the right to rescind.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
________________
R. BARCLAY SURRICK , J.