finding reasonable articulable suspicion to stop the defendant because, among other things, he was loitering in restaurant that was a known "open-air drug market" and was standing within feet of a person police observed conducting drug transactions
Summary of this case from State v. Scott122, 2006.
August 24, 2006.
Superior Cr 0503005391.
Decisions Without Published Opinions AFFIRMED.
finding reasonable articulable suspicion to stop the defendant because, among other things, he was loitering in restaurant that was a known "open-air drug market" and was standing within feet of a person police observed conducting drug transactions
Summary of this case from State v. Scottdenying review of Moody's "attempt[] to reframe his argument" because he never presented his appellate argument to the trial court
Summary of this case from Russell v. Stateallowing detention of a suspect on reasonable articulable suspicion after observing him discard what an officer believed was "a 'blunt'-a cigar known by police to be commonly hollowed out and filled with marijuana"
Summary of this case from State v. JacksonFull title:Moody v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Aug 24, 2006
Pursuant to 11 Del. C. § 1902, the detention was valid.Thomas, 8 A.3d at 1198 ("[A] police officer may…
State v. JacksonIn that sense, the car stop is analytically akin to a pedestrian stop for which the applicable reasonable…