From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Sep 20, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-574-Y (N.D. Tex. Sep. 20, 2013)

Summary

affirming ALJ's RFC of sedentary work with restrictions in climbing, stooping, kneeling, and crawling due to Plaintiff's need for a cane

Summary of this case from Heather H. v. Kijakazi

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-574-Y

2013-09-20

DELMAR P. MONTGOMERY v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S

FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION

On August 23, 2013, the United States magistrate judge issued his findings, conclusions, and recommendation ("the findings") in this case. In the findings, the magistrate judge recommended that the Court affirm the decision of the commissioner of the Social Security Administration denying Plaintiff's claim for supplemental social security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act.

An order issued that same day gave all parties until September 6 to serve and file with the Court written objections to the findings. Plaintiff has filed objections and requests that the Court reject the magistrate's findings and render an award of benefits or, alternatively, remand for additional administrative proceedings. The commissioner did not file a response.

After carefully reviewing the findings, the record, the relevant case law, and Plaintiff's objections, applying a de novo standard of review, the Court concludes that the findings should be, and are hereby, ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of this Court for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, the commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.

________

TERRY R. MEANS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Montgomery v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION
Sep 20, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-574-Y (N.D. Tex. Sep. 20, 2013)

affirming ALJ's RFC of sedentary work with restrictions in climbing, stooping, kneeling, and crawling due to Plaintiff's need for a cane

Summary of this case from Heather H. v. Kijakazi

affirming ALJ's RFC of sedentary work with restrictions in climbing, stooping, kneeling, and crawling due to Plaintiff's need for a cane

Summary of this case from Kenneth M. v. Kijakazi
Case details for

Montgomery v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:DELMAR P. MONTGOMERY v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH DIVISION

Date published: Sep 20, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:12-CV-574-Y (N.D. Tex. Sep. 20, 2013)

Citing Cases

Kenneth M. v. Kijakazi

Reese v. Saul, No. 4:19-CV-2787, 2020 WL 6804513, at *3 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2020) (finding RFC of sedentary…

Heather H. v. Kijakazi

Reese v. Saul, No. 4:19-CV-2787, 2020 WL 6804513, at *3 (S.D. Tex. Nov. 3, 2020) (finding RFC of sedentary…