From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mohammed v. Complete Pers. Logistics

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 12, 2016
Case No. 1:15-cv-414 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 12, 2016)

Summary

dismissing case with prejudice

Summary of this case from McClafferty v. Portage Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs

Opinion

Case No. 1:15-cv-414

08-12-2016

AL-MAHDI FARAD MOHAMMED, Plaintiff, v. COMPLETE PERSONNEL LOGISTICS, Defendant.



Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz

DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (Doc. 20)

This case is before the Court pursuant to the Order of General Reference in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio Western Division to United States Magistrate Judge Karen L. Litkovitz. Pursuant to such reference, the Magistrate Judge reviewed the pleadings filed with this Court and, on June 6, 2016, submitted a Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 20). Plaintiff filed objections. (Doc. 22).

Plaintiff's objections call into question the impartiality of the Magistrate Judge and suggest that both defense counsel and employees of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) have purposefully misled the Court in their filings. (Doc. 22). Plaintiff further argues that the false statements he made to the Magistrate Judge at an evidentiary hearing on June 23, 2016, were made in error and not intentionally. (Id.). However, the Court notes that Plaintiff's objections make no attempt to explain the copy of the EEOC charge he submitted that the Magistrate Judge found to be altered for the purpose of defrauding the Court. (See Doc. 20, at 7). Based on that finding, the Magistrate Judge's recommendation that the case be dismissed with prejudice is entirely appropriate. --------

As required by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has reviewed the comprehensive findings of the Magistrate Judge and considered de novo all of the filings in this matter. Upon consideration of the foregoing, the Court does determine that such Report and Recommendations should be and is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk shall enter Judgment accordingly, whereupon this case shall be TERMINATED in this Court. Date: 8/12/16

s/ Timothy S . Black

Timothy S. Black

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mohammed v. Complete Pers. Logistics

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Aug 12, 2016
Case No. 1:15-cv-414 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 12, 2016)

dismissing case with prejudice

Summary of this case from McClafferty v. Portage Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs
Case details for

Mohammed v. Complete Pers. Logistics

Case Details

Full title:AL-MAHDI FARAD MOHAMMED, Plaintiff, v. COMPLETE PERSONNEL LOGISTICS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 12, 2016

Citations

Case No. 1:15-cv-414 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 12, 2016)

Citing Cases

McClafferty v. Portage Cnty. Bd. of Comm'rs

A party's fabrication and presentation of false documents to the court is a classic example of the type of…