From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mitts v. H.I.P. of Greater New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 16, 1984
104 A.D.2d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Summary

In Mitts, a medical malpractice action, the First Department held that defendant, HIP, did not treat or render medical services, and could not be held liable for the actions of co-defendant-medical group.

Summary of this case from Ayers v. Mohan

Opinion

August 16, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Altman, J.).


In this medical malpractice action, defendant Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York (H.I.P.) moves for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it. In a recent appeal, we have considered the identical issue of whether H.I.P. may be held liable in malpractice for the actions of a medical group or a physician employed by a particular medical group. In that appeal, we affirmed, without opinion, an order of Justice Alvin Klein dismissing a complaint as against H.I.P. ( McGrorty v Health Ins. Plan, 98 A.D.2d 1000).

In his decision dated October 21, 1982, Justice Klein succinctly stated the reasons for the dismissal: "HIP is a non-profit membership corporation which sells medical expense indemnity insurance (see Shapiro v. Health Insurance Plan, 7 N.Y.2d 56). HIP does not treat or render medical service or care to anyone. Each medical group participating in the plan is an independent contractor. Accordingly, HIP cannot be held responsible for the acts of one of the groups for malpractice (Horn v. State, 31 A.D.2d 364; Fiorentino v. W[e]nger, 19 N.Y.2d 407) ".

For these same reasons, we now grant H.I.P.'s motion for summary judgment. In light of this determination, we also grant the cross motion to change venue to Queens County. All remaining parties to the action are residents of that county. Furthermore, the malpractice allegedly occurred there.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sandler, Carro, Silverman and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Mitts v. H.I.P. of Greater New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 16, 1984
104 A.D.2d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

In Mitts, a medical malpractice action, the First Department held that defendant, HIP, did not treat or render medical services, and could not be held liable for the actions of co-defendant-medical group.

Summary of this case from Ayers v. Mohan
Case details for

Mitts v. H.I.P. of Greater New York

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS MITTS, an Infant, by his Mother and Natural Guardian, MARILYN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 16, 1984

Citations

104 A.D.2d 318 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
478 N.Y.S.2d 910

Citing Cases

Ayers v. Mohan

. Here, in support of their argument that a change of venue pursuant to CPLR § 510(1) (i.e., that the county…

Wecht v. Glen Distributors Company

Of lesser, but still some importance, are such factors as the special consideration to be given to the…