From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Miscellaneous Orders

U.S.
Dec 4, 2000
531 U.S. 1037 (2000)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding that Brecht standard applies in all federal habeas cases under § 2254

Summary of this case from Studebaker v. Uribe
See 6 Summaries

Opinion

DECEMBER 4, 2000

00-574 FODOR v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (TIME WARNER, INC., ET AL., REAL PARTIES IN INTEREST). C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-580 MEMBERS OF FLORIDA FIRST COAST CHAPTER, NATIONAL BUSINESS LEAGUE v. CITY OF JACKSONVILLE. C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 212 F.3d 600.

00-609 BETHLEHEM STEEL CORP. ET AL. v. HARTE. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 214 F.3d 446.

00-614 BRADY v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 499.

00-625 BAINS v. CAMBRA, WARDEN. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 204 F.3d 964.

00-657 MAYERS v. TENNESSEE BOARD OF REGENTS ET AL. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.

00-672 RISTOVSKI v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 211 F.3d 1271.

00-681 CALHOUN ET UX. v. YAMAHA MOTOR CORP., U.S.A., ET AL. C.A.3d Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 216 F.3d 388.

00-698 HICKS v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 1038.

00-710 RANSOM v. CSC CONSULTING, INC., DBA CSC INDEX. C.A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 467.

00-715 ROBERTSON v. COMPTROLLER OF THE TREASURY OF MARYLAND. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 217 F.3d 840.

00-729 BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OF OHIO, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 219 F.3d 300.

00-5077 BUCHANAN v. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE. C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 213 F.3d 638.

Summaries of

Miscellaneous Orders

U.S.
Dec 4, 2000
531 U.S. 1037 (2000)

holding that Brecht standard applies in all federal habeas cases under § 2254

Summary of this case from Studebaker v. Uribe

collecting numerous cases applying Brecht

Summary of this case from Fortini v. Murphy

stating that a claimant under the FTCA must comply with 28 U.S.C. § 2675 before a district court can exert jurisdiction over the claim

Summary of this case from Moore-Bey v. United States

stating that a claimant under the FTCA must comply with 28 U.S.C. § 2675 before a district court can exert jurisdiction over the claim

Summary of this case from Moore-Bey v. United States

stating that a claimant under the Federal Tort Claims Act must comply with 28 U.S.C. § 2675 before a district court can exert jurisdiction over the claim

Summary of this case from Anaya v. Van Vugt

stating that a claimant under the Federal Tort Claims Act must comply with 28 U.S.C. § 2675 before a district court can exert jurisdiction over the claim

Summary of this case from Jones v. Speidell
Case details for

Miscellaneous Orders

Case Details

Full title:MISCELLANEOUS ORDERS

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 4, 2000

Citations

531 U.S. 1037 (2000)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Woodford

In this federal collateral proceeding, however, the harmless error standard is whether the error "`had…

White v. Ollison

This standard under California state law is the equivalent of the Brecht standard under federal law. . .…

86 Citing Cases